The “Literature” has ever written fiction, as well as comics totally meet those criteria. (A few people in their answers are translating ‘literature’ to mean ‘literary fiction’ which is basically a type. It’s most certainly not. Literature is a body.) However, Comics are likewise visual art/fine art/illustration. So the appropriate response is in reality sort of tangled.
Plays are thought about literature, however, they’re comprised of dialogue and stage direction, however, though individual performances thought about literature. Television Shows, Films, and Audio Dramas aren’t normally considered ‘plays’ obviously they are, and their scripts would surely fall under literature also. By that criteria, a comic book content (dialogue, ‘stage directions’ to the artist) would constitute literature, and if those scripts are distributed independently (and many have been) at that point, they’re literature without question.
In any case, a finished comic book is less similar to a play’s script and more like a play’s performance – though a static one. It’s a full execution of that content, which has likewise been translated and adjusted by the artist by need. It is without a doubt art, however, an different artist could take a similar script and create a totally unique comic sheerly by dint of masterful vision, viewpoint and interpretation of the writer’s content.
All in all, are comic books themselves literature? No. They’re art that blends delineation and text into a medium. In any case, a script of that comic book (even one made sometime later) would be literature, the same as a play.
You should comprehend that by “literature,” you seldom mean any longer much else besides a written piece of work. We don’t have lofty standards like you used to, as when the Romantics pined for feeling and the New Critics for organic unity. Instead of focusing on the content of the work – in the event that it is elegantly written, and the study and identification of literature originates from seeing how individuals engage in this written material.
Questions that try to conflate the word “literature” to mean something written + its natural esteem are subsequently presently addresses which are unimportant, and in actuality double-cross a kind of backward thinking that express that except if a work reflects certain qualities it can’t be considered among the objects you designate “art.”
Not all comics are art. Shouldn’t something be said about the comics that are art? What kind of art would they say they are? Specifically, are comics a type of literature? For an assortment of reasons it is enticing to imagine that at least a few comics are literature. However, numerous theorists dismiss the ‘comics as literature’ view. What’s more, albeit a few purposes behind opposing that view are misinformed, there are other valid justifications for being reluctant about treating comics as a literature. This abandons everyone at an impasse regarding the classification of comics.
As we all know that how much kids love reading comic books. They learn a lot of things from those stories. There is lots of Bal Kahani from which children’s enjoy reading comic books. are a great source to make reluctant readers into ravenous readers. They are way helpful in enhancing a child’s inference and the bank of words.
